[ENH] Case independent numbers
Jarvis, Robert P. (Contingent)
Jarvisb at timken.com
Thu Mar 2 13:35:14 UTC 2000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Ingalls [SMTP:Dan.Ingalls at disney.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 5:30 PM
> To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: RE: [ENH] Case independent numbers
> I will have to admit to a bit of bigotry here. I was the originator of
> the numeric format, and I object to a couple of the ANSI decisions
> regarding the syntax of numeric constants. I have three reasons for
> 1. I much prefer 2r1e31 to 2r10000000000000000000000000000000 for the
> sign bit and 16rFe8 for the high nibble of a 32-bit integer and 10e6 for a
> million. Come on.
> 2. I just feel that the current (Squeak) def, which is the original one,
> is a micro world of simplicity and generality. Radix, digits and exponent
> defined analogously over ints, largeInts, and Floats. That's all.
> 3. I have spent entire hours with inquisitive kids, just exploring this
> micro world. If they get bored with 2r1e10 then it's time to step out and
> explore the meaning of 3r11.2.
Hmmmm. OK, I think I understand your view on this. But it's still not
Compuware @ Timken
*Definition of "intuitive" is based on subjective factors such as life
experience and may vary between individuals. Dealer contribution may affect
final cost. Tax, title, and dealer prep not included.
More information about the Squeak-dev