Morphic slow in 2.8 (was: Forecast)

Stephane Ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu Oct 5 13:09:52 UTC 2000


There are new version 
	a mean alpha
	you should at least take 2.8
	go into one of the doanload sites and take a 2.8 on your platform.
	
	STef


> Resent-date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 03:30:01 +0000
> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 03:30:11 +0000 (GMT)
> Resent-from: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> From: Adam Bloom <admanb at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Morphic slow in 2.8 (was: Forecast)
> Resent-sender: squeak-request at cs.uiuc.edu
> To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> Resent-message-id: <lxQ2X.A.h9C.4W_25 at jerry.cs.uiuc.edu>
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> X-Loop: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> X-Originating-IP: [209.245.168.40]
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2000 03:30:11.0468 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[91490CC0:01C02E7C]
> X-Mailing-List: <squeak at cs.uiuc.edu> archive/latest/25380
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >From: Bob Arning <arning at charm.net>
> >Reply-To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> >To: <squeak at cs.uiuc.edu>
> >Subject: Re: Morphic slow in 2.8 (was: Forecast)
> >Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:21:40 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> 
> What is this 2.8, 2.9a Squeak I keep hearing about? The highest I've ever 
> seen was 2.7, and that was a Squeak.org.
> 
> Adam
> 
> >On Wed, 04 Oct 2000 16:33:40 -0600 David Farber <dfarber at numenor.com> 
> >wrote:
> > >Bob - i ran your test. here is what i got:
> > >
> > >in 2.7:
> > > - 648 tallies, 13950 msec.
> > >**Leaves**
> > >36.7 DisplayScreen>>forceToScreen:
> > >27.6 GrafPort>>copyBits
> > >5.7 PasteUpMorph>>displayWorld
> > >2.2 Rectangle>>top
> > >
> > >in 2.8:
> > >- 990 tallies, 21762 msec.
> > >**Leaves**
> > >35.7% {7769ms} BalloonEngine>>copyLoopFaster
> > >21.9% {4766ms} GrafPort>>copyBits
> > >10.8% {2350ms} DisplayScreen>>forceToScreen:
> > >
> > >does this help?
> >
> >David,
> >
> >I think it does. I have included my results for 2.7 and 2.8 below. Note 
> >that they are quite similar overall even though the 2.8 version has the 
> >gradient fill while the 2.7 does not. Your results however, show a big 
> >increase from 2.7 to 2.8 and a huge amount of time in the Balloon engine 
> >just doing the background. This leads me to wonder if the VM you are using 
> >for 2.8 has the Balloon stuff builtin (or in the right place externally). 
> >Maybe some other Windows users can tell us if they are seeing similar 
> >changes.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Bob
> >
> >2.7 Mac G3/400  - 360 tallies, 7044 msec.
> >
> >**Leaves**
> >14.4 GrafPort>>copyBits
> >7.8 Rectangle>>left
> >5.0 Rectangle>>top
> >3.9 Rectangle(ProtoObject)>>ifNil:
> >3.9 Rectangle>>bottom
> >3.1 SystemWindow(Morph)>>fullBounds
> >2.8 Point>>+
> >2.5 Array(SequenceableCollection)>>do:
> >2.5 Array(SequenceableCollection)>>reverseDo:
> >2.2 Rectangle>>right
> >
> >2.8 Mac G3/400  - 336 tallies, 7132 msec.
> >
> >and
> >**Leaves**
> >20.8% {1483ms} GrafPort>>copyBits
> >8.9% {635ms} BalloonEngine>>copyLoopFaster
> >4.5% {321ms} Rectangle>>top
> >3.6% {257ms} Rectangle>>right
> >3.0% {214ms} DisplayScreen>>forceToScreen:
> >2.7% {193ms} Rectangle>>bottom
> >2.7% {193ms} Rectangle>>left
> >2.4% {171ms} FormCanvas>>isVisible:
> >2.4% {171ms} AlignmentMorph>>fullBounds
> >
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> 
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
> http://profiles.msn.com.
> 

Stephane DUCASSE (ducasse at iam.unibe.ch) http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~ducasse/
"if you knew today was your last day on earth, what would you do 
different? ... especially if, by doing something different, today 
might not be your last day on earth" Calvin&Hobbes

University of Bern, Institut fuer informatik and Mathematik
IAM-SCG, 10 neubruckstrasse, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.






More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list