optional panes out-of-the-box, and other preferences
Bruce ONeel
beoneel at mindspring.com
Tue Feb 6 15:42:34 UTC 2001
Hi,
Oh, this is pretty nice straight out of the box :-)
My one wish would be to do something better when Squeak
tries to play a sound and the OS can't support it rather than
hanging. This is going to catch a lot of unix users out.
cheers
bruce
Scott Wallace <Scott.Wallace at disney.com> wrote:
> We're seeking opinions about the out-of-the-box settings of various
> preferences and parameters in Squeak 3.0.
>
> One consideration is whether or not the browsers and other tools
> should, by default, show the optional annotation panes and button
> panes.
>
> My sense is that many people do prefer to use these panes if they
> know about them. Some long-time Smalltalkers don't like them, and
> many newcomers don't know of them, but a preponderance of us fall
> between those two extremes and do use them. So my inclination is to
> have the ancillary panes showing by default. Certainly anyone who
> proactively did *not* want them would have no difficulty in turning
> them off in Preferences.
>
> (Incidentally, I think that before too long -- but after 3.0 -- we
> will have controls that allow optional panes to be added and removed
> on-the-fly in any window, just as they can in any modern web browser.
> When this comes along, this should give us the best of both worlds,
> and it will reduce the importance of whatever choice we make right
> now regarding the optional panes.)
>
> Everyone with opinions to register regarding the out-of-box settings
> of these two preferences, or those of any other preference,
> parameter, project color, default object size, default font, etc.:
> this would be a good time to make yourselves heard.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Scott
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|