On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew C. Greenberg wrote:

>  From a quick review, thePPL's definitions of Covered Code raises the 
> virus-swallows-the-entire-image problem, I think.  Any chance we can get 
> someone to agree to dual-license?  Otherwise, it seems we should adopt 
> instead the unambiguously Squeak-L code.

My guess is "Yes". Or at least "probably".

Cincom's lawyers seem to get all confused about licences. James Roberston
(The VisualWorks project manager), however, is quite enthused by all this
sort of sharing. I feel confident that something could be worked out.

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.