Cool, I wondered about that...I remembered about a year ago someone wrote
to the list about SDL, but I may have missed the code.

:)

So, in theory, if this code can be rolled into a recent VM, it should be able
to write directly to the framebuffer (for those of us who desire it)...not
sure if SDL handles mouse events as well, though.

On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 08:46:28PM -0400, Lex Spoon wrote:
> Kevin Fisher <kgf at golden.net> wrote:
> > Framebuffer would be neat, but I think a better idea would be an SDL-enabled
> > Squeak...that way we could support any graphical target, whether it be
> > X11, framebuffer or OpenGL (not to mention the different sound output targets
> > SDL knows about).
> > 
> 
> SDL support been implemented:
> 
> 	http://www.zipcon.net/~adamf/software/squeak/sdl-squeak.shtml
> 
> If anyone wants to try to fold it back in with the main Squeak release
> that would be awesome.
> 
> -Lex
>