goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:

>Hi Marco and all!
>
>Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de> wrote:
>
>Well, if you have SqueakMap installed (otherwise just select
>open->package loader, in the World menu) then look at
>SMSqueakMap>>loadUpdatesFrom:log:
>
>The line with "Compiler yadda yadda" evaluates a String read from the
>file containing arbitrary Smalltalk code. That is what is commonly
>referred to as a "do-it" (since that is the name of the menu choice in
>the right-click menu of most textareas by which you can evaluate the
>text selected with the mouse).
>  
>
I see what you mean. This seems to be interesting. If it is for 
production?? If I would use this format I would always think that the 
program is just a short hack for my problem.

>  
>
>>>- SIXX (XML serialization) implemented by "Masashi Umezawa"
>>><umejava at mars.dti.ne.jp> (on SqueakMap)
>>>      
>>>
>>I think I will implement it too.
>>
>>I will use XML and the normal serialization process of squeak. But what 
>>would be the advantages? I can't see any.
>>    
>>
>
>Advantages for what?
>
I meant: What is better in XML than the squeak only formats. Hannes 
answered it.

>
>regards, Göran
>
>
>
>  
>
Regards
Marco