Doug Way <dway at riskmetrics.com> wrote:
[SNIP]
> It sounds like we're agreed that PackageInfo should be something of a 
> standard for now.  We could plan on adding PackageInfo to the update 
> stream soon.  (Possibly along with SqueakMap and SAR.  Well, depending 
> on whether those get added to the update stream or kept on some sort of 
> Basic Image package... more on that later.)

Since SAR, DVS and PackageInfo today are installed together with SM -
and they are probably very much needed because otherwise a *lot* of
packages will not be able to install - these packages will "tag along"
when a "load SM" instruction is added to the stream.

regards, Göran