Some MC questions
Julian Fitzell
julian at beta4.com
Wed Sep 17 00:12:44 UTC 2003
I've said this before too. I don't think we should be using revision
numbers as versions. Particularly since the numbers in revision names
are essentially meaningless in MC. It's like Squeak releases: we can
indicate what update number the release is based on, but we still have a
version number that indicates whether it is a major or minor release,
etc. And then they keep going up even when we move to a new revision
numbering scheme or repository (as has happened 3 or 4 times with
Seaside recently).
Julian
Avi Bryant wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
>
>
>>BTW, I've just upgraded from 13 to 9. Can Colin and you, for my sanity,
>>please keep the versions (at least in SM) monotonously rising?
>
>
> We have been. Current SM version is 13. I believe 9 was the previous SM
> version. Perhaps you had an old image that you hadn't updated the map in?
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|