Just an idea - would a "website and other documentation" category on 
Mantis be appropriate? Then the new site can point at mantis.

BTW, should bugs.squeak.org be an alias for bugs.impara.de?

Daniel

Ken Causey wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 12:31 -0500, Mark P. McCahill wrote:
> 
>>On the new www.squeak.org site, this page
>>
>>     http://www.squeak.org/features/speech.html
>>
>>has a dead link to the Klatt speech synthesis stuff
>>on page that no longer exists at this location:
>>    http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/1112.html
>>
>>I think this should point to
>>    http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/1112
>>instead.
>>
> 
> 
> Fixed.
> 
> 
>>...and in looking for someone to report this to, I realized
>>that there is no apparent web master for the site. We might
>>want one, so that there is a clear way to report trouble.
> 
> 
> Let's not forget that these changes are resulting from a desire to
> distribute duties such as this among the community as much as possible.
> So sending a message to the list is actually fine although providing a
> more specific subject would have made it less likely that this request
> would have been missed.
> 
> For changes to the 'old' site you can do worse than sending an email to
> the 'administrators' of the system who have the ready access to make
> such changes.  You can do that by sending an email to
> box-admins at discuss.squeakfoundation.org which is a mailing list but open
> to submissions by all.
> 
> As far as the new site goes they also have a list
> website at discuss.squeakfoundation.org and I would recommend that if they
> have not already done so that they open up their list to submissions by
> non-subscribers so that support requests can be handled by the team as a
> whole.  Alternatively they might consider setting up a seperate
> 'support' list that is open to all submissions.
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>