Thanks Colin! This is just the kind of information I am looking for.

Cheers,
   - Andreas

Colin Putney wrote:
> Andreas Raab wrote:
> 
>> Interesting. Are people actually using Swazoo in production settings? 
>> (I thought Swazoo was more like one of those "let's do it from scratch 
>> and do it Right(tm)" regardless of the realities out there ;-) But 
>> I'll definitely check it out.
> 
> 
> I am. Kom is elegant - very modular and configurable. What I like about 
> Swazoo-Listener is that it's *not* modular and configurable. It's small 
> and simple, and it was trivial to write a little adapter to pass 
> requests off to Seaside.
> 
> This is perfect for running a Seaside app in a larger, Apache-hosted 
> site, since Apache is plenty modular and configurable too, and you 
> probably want it handling things like logging, static files etc. I use 
> mod_proxy to map forward requests to Squeak.
> 
> Note that I don't know much about the performance of Swazoo. My site is 
> low volume, so it doesn't matter much, and I haven't measured.
> 
> 
>