-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Sébastien Rocca-Serra wrote:
> Hi,
> We develop a Web application with Squeak that will soon go in production.
> 
> It's our first experience with Squeak, so we need advice before
> installing the image on the production server.
> 
> Context
> -------
> We plan to use a headless 3.8 image on a debian Sarge server with a
> 3.9.7 VM.
> 
> Questions
> ---------
> - Any reason to use a 3.8 image -- like more stability?
> - Any reason to use a 3.9 image -- like essential bug fixes? (we do not
> use Traits)
> 
> - Do we need to strip or shrink the image (and if yes, how)?
> - Or is it best to start from a small squeak image (and in that case
> which one)?
> 
> - Are there subtle performance tweaks, (made up example: closing all
> windows in the image)?
> 
> - Is the squeak-vm_3.9.7-9_i386.deb VM package suitable for production?
> 
> Thanks !
> Seb.
> 
> 
> 

If you want to use Debian packages, here

	http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3616

should be complete information. There is information concerning Seaside too.

If there were any problems, let me know.

Regards
- --
Matej Kosik
icq: 300133844
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFXLh3L+CaXfJI/hgRAhy5AJ4toWoyJrgbuJiNUtuJPtAmvPTMHgCgm9Ua
jcoGHPUL3N/Nr4PTEvxGHiA=
=01Hn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----