Well that sounds great.

>From: goran at krampe.se
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: re: 3.10 questions
>Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:30:35 +0200
>
>Hi!
>
>"J J" <azreal1977 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >So the enhancement I intend to try to push would go
> > >through Mantis simply.
> >
> > I assume the enhancement you intend to try to push is your namespace
> > solution?
>
>Nope! :)
>
>My Namespaces solution is way too "controversial" it seems - I don't
>have the energy to do the advocacy for it.
>
>No, this is about the code that has slightly rotted and is sitting in
>PackageInfo-Extras. I wrote some of it, then Ned wrote something similar
>- then Ned merged it and it got a bit b0rken.
>
>Among its most noteworthy features it adds some menu choices to the
>changesorters so that you can split and send a changeset to the package
>maintainers whose packages it touches. It goes through the cs and
>creates new changesets ("splits") from it based on what PI the code
>belongs to. Then it composes an email with both the splits and the
>original cs and figures out all affected maintainers by looking at the
>PI fields in SM.
>
>I have on several occasions promised to whip it back into shape and get
>it added - it would make it very, very easy for people to push patches
>directly to the affected maintainers/stewards.
>
>regards, Göran
>

_________________________________________________________________
The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here.  Get all the scoop. 
http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2