Support of algebraic operations on dictionaries (was: ... sets)

J J azreal1977 at hotmail.com
Wed Jun 20 16:49:38 UTC 2007


> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:53:14 +0300> From: siguctua at gmail.com> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org> Subject: Re: Support of algebraic operations on dictionaries (was: ... sets)>> Another example of breaking protocol rules. Do you see any practical> and good use in overriding #do: in Dictionary to iterate through list> of values instead of associations by default? I don't. I'm serious.Well, if one views a Dictionary as an Array type collection that just happens to use something other then numbers as the index, then one would expect #do: to operate on the values as it does with other indexable collections.
_________________________________________________________________
Make every IM count. Download Windows Live Messenger and join the i’m Initiative now. It’s free.  
http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGWL_June07
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20070620/917b0ef8/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list