Damien Cassou-3 wrote:
> 
> The refactoring of Nathanael keeps the implementation of methods.
> Methods are just moved from a class to a trait. This brings reusable
> traits, but the result could have been better.
> 
> What we are doing with Nile is more like a complete reimplementation
> trying to keep the same API when it makes sense. Method
> implementations are completely different. Our traits have been made to
> be reusable and to have their own meaning. They are not built to
> factorize existing classes.
> 
> Is it clearer?
> 
> 

Yes, it is clear now, thank you

regards, 
 Danil

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Ann--Nile-0.8.0-available-tf3726678.html#a10638762
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.