On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Keith Hodges <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>wrote:

> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >
> > On 02.09.2009, at 09:33, Damien Cassou wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Michael van der
> >> Gulik<mikevdg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Would it perhaps be better to have the automated trunk commit
> >>> messages going
> >>> to some other dedicated mailing list?
> Which we already have.
> >> With squeaksource, it is easy to get an RSS feed of a package. That
> >> way only people interested get noticed.
> >
> >
> > Why would people on squeak-dev not be interested in Squeak development?
> 1. Not having time.
>
> 2. Poluting the exisiting actual human messages with extra stuff to
> trawl through when you are searching for something.
>


95% of the human messages end up in my trash unread. I'm finding about the
same proportion of commit messages are relevant to me as human messages.

I'm becoming a bit of a fan of the commit messages. You can see what's
happening, and it's the best forum for discussing changes.

Gulik.





-- 
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090903/08fa7c25/attachment.htm