Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I've just updated Cuis to 2.1 at 
>> http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html . From the release notes:
>>
>> Cuis Release notes
>> Only the most relevant Cuis specific changes are detailed here. To 
>> see all of them, browse the numbered changes themselves, that are 
>> part of this release. Cuis official site is 
>> http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html .
>>
>> New in Cuis 2.1
>> - Support for the Unary numeral system, as suggested by Dan Ingalls 
>> at 
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2000-March/013368.html 
>>
>> - A new code differ that shows differences in words and not lines, by 
>> Leandro Caniglia
>> - Closure measurements (based on work by Eliot Miranda) are shown in 
>> the annotation pane for any method
>> - Removal of 43 isXXX methods, replaced by the general #is: method
>> - Misc. fixes and enhancements from Squeak and/or Pharo
>>
>> New in Cuis 2.0
>> - Cuis is now closure-enabled. The closure examples xxxx work, and 
>> Cuis is ready to run on the Cog VM (when available). Cuis 2.0 
>> requires a closures-enabled VM
>>
>> I recommend everybody to see the new class comment in Number, and try 
>> the new number format! The alternative code differ by Leando, based 
>> on words and not lines is worth trying too. Finally, the Closure 
>> measurements for every method are instructive and useful. Warning: I 
>> fixed 2 bugs in Eliot's code, as I said in 
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-February/144120.html 
>> .
>
> I tried the new number format, it works, but Shout doesn't know about 
> it and 1r1e1 is parsed as 1r1 e1.

Thanks, I forgot about Shout. Will do a new release soon, it seems!

> You can also get the word based diff using TextDiffBuilder by 
> subclassing it and overriding #split:. Actually ClassDiffBuilder does 
> exactly this, so using ClassDiffBuilder instead of TextDiffBuilder 
> will give you the expected result.
>
> The Closure measurements are really cool, but I think the descriptions 
> are a bit too long for a single line annotation pane.

Yes. I'll make the default height a bit larger. I'm always enlarging it now.

Cheers,
Juan Vuletich

>
> Levente