On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

>
>
>
> On 3/16/10 8:30 AM, "Göran Krampe" <goran at krampe.se> wrote:
>
>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0
>>
>
> Squeak4.0-basic <http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/Squeak4.0-basic.zip>
>
>
> We have any not basic for 4.0?
> Clarify, please.

I guess because only the code in this image is license clean.

>
>> For 3.10.1 the release team abandoned the policy of issuing updates
>> by modifying a repository of core packages and reverted to the old
>> style of simple changesets in the update stream.  As a result of
>> this the Monticello Browser shows that some of the packages have
>> been modified in the local image but not saved to the repository.
>
>
> False.
> If we go to simple changesets , I would not have had to pull my hair for 18
> months
>
> Could use simple changesets for 4.1 ?
> At less until the Closures enter to the system , then take the current trunk
> policy until.... .

Why do you think changesets are better than monticello packages + configurations?

> When 4.1 ends ?

Good question.


Levente

>
>
> O maybe I should wait until people speak with his vote ?
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
>