On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

> Am 2010-10-27 um 23:25 schrieb Eliot Miranda:
> >
> >
> > > Off the top of my head, only the latter makes sense.  There are no
> senders of allowUnderscoreAsAssignment in the base Compiler package so one
> would be tempted to delete it.  Why can't it be an extension in OB?
> >
> > Because its about AST ;)
> >
> > So why not an extension in AST?  :)
> >
>
> Where would you put that, better, where would you put AST-Core-Squeak…?
> or how one should name it…
>

That's not my question to answer.  But why add a method with no senders in
Compiler, that is needed by AST (and transitively by OB) to Compiler rather
than somewhere appropriate in AST?

best,
Eliot


>
> So Long,
>         -Tobias
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20101027/35407bda/attachment.htm