So if I want to copy a selector, e.g. to paste it into message names I then
have to delete the lass>> part?  Please, can we add a "copy signature"
instead of change the semantics of something perfectly useful?

Also,isn't "method reference" a better name for aClass>>selector than
signature? Signatures typically have arity, return and argument type
information .  This is something a little simpler.

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:50 PM, <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:

> Chris Muller uploaded a new version of Monticello to project The Trunk:
> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Monticello-cmm.400.mcz
>
> ==================== Summary ====================
>
> Name: Monticello-cmm.400
> Author: cmm
> Time: 19 September 2010, 4:50:02.156 pm
> UUID: 815ed4bb-b5b4-420c-9639-018beb254ae9
> Ancestors: Monticello-bf.399
>
> Change "copy selector" to copy the signature of the method to the
> clipboard, not just the selector.
>
> =============== Diff against Monticello-bf.399 ===============
>
> Item was changed:
>  ----- Method: MCCodeTool>>copySelector (in category 'menus') -----
>  copySelector
>        "Copy the selected selector to the clipboard"
> +       self selectedMessageName ifNotNilDo:
> +               [ : selector | Clipboard clipboardText:
> +                       (self selectedClassOrMetaClass
> +                               ifNil: [ selector asString ]
> +                               ifNotNilDo: [ : cls | (cls >> selector)
> signature ]) ]!
> -
> -       | selector |
> -       (selector := self selectedMessageName) ifNotNil:
> -               [Clipboard clipboardText: selector asString]!
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100919/4daf225c/attachment.htm