[squeak-dev] Re: [Vm-dev] VM Maker: VMMaker-oscog.52.mcz
siguctua at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 01:26:06 UTC 2011
On 21 March 2011 02:16, Matthew Fulmer <tapplek at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:02:05PM +0100, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>> I agree that having different repos could simplify things.
>> Except things which will otherwise complicate them:
>> - publishing new VMMaker version sends nice email to mailing list
> This is just a setting in SqueakSource that can be set for any
> repository. Just have both repositories notify this list
>> - configuration(s) to automatically load VMMaker with all
>> dependencies relying on having VMMaker package at certain known
>> not at multiple ones.
> If you want to load a working VMMaker, you aren't going to mix
> stuff from cog and stable VMMaker repositories without a manual
> merge first. And if you are talking about .mcm files, they
> support multiple repositories, as long as package names are not
> duplicated (like, if there are two different packages named
> VMMaker-oscog.52 in each repo, it's undefined which one mcm will
No i'm talking about Metacello configuration, which currently used to
But you are right, i still manually control each update, so i can
always change the location & packages which should be loaded
for new version(s).
> Matthew Fulmer (a.k.a. Tapple)
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Squeak-dev