On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>wrote:

> On 2013-04-24, at 16:46, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 23 April 2013 15:14, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> >>  A possible solution would be to go through the whole update map first
> and find the "bad" moves (those where a method or class would be deleted
> and later added again) and load only these. Since it only reclassifies, the
> actual system behavior would be unchanged. But the loading would succeed
> without introducing obsolete instances and missing methods.
> >> Could a preamble with the method in concern inlined work ?
> >
> > Karl
>
> That would be way too fragile, IMHO. And I think it would make
> contributing such recategorizations harder, not easier.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
Ok
Karl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130424/0f99783e/attachment.htm