>> ... It seems to me that backward compatibility is
>> jeopardized in this process (I know it's not a Pharo value, but it is a
>> Squeak one).
>
> <rant>
> What's up with some people in the Squeak "camp" trying to artificially
> draw distinctions between Squeak and Pharo - to the point of FUD, like
> the above statement.

Keep cool, man. I just expressed a fact, and a worry as far as I am 
concerned, because I do need backward compatibility if I expect muO to 
grow with Squeak. I have no problem with Pharo project nor people, so 
please don't create trouble where there is none. This is a technical 
discussion.


Stef