[squeak-dev] Re: Is this a bug with Step "Over"?
Das.Linux at gmx.de
Wed Jun 24 06:04:54 UTC 2015
On 23.06.2015, at 23:23, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why not vice versa? Halt being a Warning would be more natural to me than Warning being
>> a Halt.
> We really should structure the class hierarchy based on the exception
> handling use-cases we want to support, not semantics. If Halt
> inherited from Warning, then applications would no longer be able to
> halt separately from handling Warnings (except by handling Halt too,
> no way!).
Then they should be siblings in any case.
More information about the Squeak-dev