On 10.07.2016, at 21:53, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

> Him
> 
> On 10.07.2016, at 21:51, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I've committed a non urgent change just to check:
>> There's now a single failure instead of 3 with a raw log:
>> No output has been received in the last 10m0s, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself.
>> https://travis-ci.org/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/jobs/143745141
>> 
>> So IMO, it's green.
> 
> I've restarted that job, let's seem, maybe it was just a spurious thing.

Yes, all green now :)

Best regards
	-Tobias

> 
> Best regards
> 	-tobias
> 
>> 
>> 2016-07-10 17:07 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>:
>> Hi Eliot,
>> The last build #158 at https://travis-ci.org/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/builds is red.
>> But I suspect false positive.
>> 
>> The details are at https://travis-ci.org/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/builds/143459279
>> where only 3 build failed on macosx64 for newspeak and pharo, but succeeded on linux64 and squeak...
>> Either the build should also fail for squeak if it's OS dependent.
>> Or it should also fail for linux64 if it Smalltalk target dependent.
>> But this combination is weird.
>> 
>> Clicking on any of the failure won't give any information (empty raw log, ellapsed time not indicated...) while it works for succeeded builds... 
>> 
>> 2016-07-10 16:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
>> Hi Yoshiki,
>> 
>>    try an up-to-date VM.  I'd point you to Travis could but I don't see entirely green builds there right now.  So pick up the most up-to-date VM from my site.
>> 
>> _,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
>> 
>>> On Jul 8, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <Yoshiki.Ohshima at acm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am trying a few things on Squeak 5.0.  In earlier versions there was
>>> AndreasSystemProfier (formerly known as QSystemProfier) and had a
>>> method called spyOnWorldFor:, which was quite useful.  I just loaded
>>> AndreasProfier-eem.11.mcz and tried it but it crashed the 5.0 all in
>>> one VM on Mac OS 10.10.
>>> 
>>> Is this a known issue?  Is there an alternative to it?