> On 30.04.2020, at 11:21, Marcel Taeumel <marcel.taeumel at hpi.de> wrote:
> 
> > I think: If you want to use new Smalltalk software via Metacello, use "Metacello new ...", regardless of the Smalltalk you're using.
> 
> From a generic Smalltalk perspective, sure. But that's not the role of Installer here. :-) Let's discuss it in a Squeak-specific way: Installer vs. SqueakMap, it is then. Metacello should not be part of that discussion. It is an external project not within the control of the Squeak community. Still, compatibility is very important. It is just a different discussion.
> 
> Still +1 for InstallerMetacello.

I don't get it then. Why Installer vs Squeakmap but then +1 for InstallerMetacello?

I specifically do not want more than one method to install Metacello projects.
-1

Best regards
	-Tobias

> 
> Best,
> Marcel
>> Am 30.04.2020 11:00:41 schrieb Tobias Pape <das.linux at gmx.de>:
>> 
>> 
>> > On 30.04.2020, at 10:57, Marcel Taeumel wrote:
>> > 
>> > Installer has a very big advantage: its name. That name is descriptive und discoverable. We should benefit from that and evolve Installer into something we all like. :-)
>> 
>> This is its disadvantage: it means too many different things to different people at different levels.
>> I hold that it is _not_ descriptive in that way :)
>> 
>> I think: If you want to use new Smalltalk software via Metacello, use "Metacello new ...", regardless of the Smalltalk you're using.
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards
>> -Tobias
>> 
>