[squeak-dev] Installer metacello

Marcel Taeumel marcel.taeumel at hpi.de
Thu Apr 30 09:21:16 UTC 2020


> I think: If you want to use new Smalltalk software via Metacello, use "Metacello new ...", regardless of the Smalltalk you're using.

>From a generic Smalltalk perspective, sure. But that's not the role of Installer here. :-) Let's discuss it in a Squeak-specific way: Installer vs. SqueakMap, it is then. Metacello should not be part of that discussion. It is an external project not within the control of the Squeak community. Still, compatibility is very important. It is just a different discussion.

Still +1 for InstallerMetacello.

Best,
Marcel
Am 30.04.2020 11:00:41 schrieb Tobias Pape <das.linux at gmx.de>:

> On 30.04.2020, at 10:57, Marcel Taeumel wrote:
>
> Installer has a very big advantage: its name. That name is descriptive und discoverable. We should benefit from that and evolve Installer into something we all like. :-)

This is its disadvantage: it means too many different things to different people at different levels.
I hold that it is _not_ descriptive in that way :)

I think: If you want to use new Smalltalk software via Metacello, use "Metacello new ...", regardless of the Smalltalk you're using.


Best regards
-Tobias

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20200430/a6619a57/attachment.html>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list