Hi everyone,

Then we need a discussion what the package pane browser _should_ be.

Since it has "package" in the name, in my opinion it should display
packages, not category prefixes. Only then it can meaningfully work with
extension methods and truthfully support looking into the package
decomposition.

So I still support that patch of Christoph's, even if that is not the
original behavior.

Please add your thoughts.

Kind regards,
Jakob



Stephen Travis Pope <stephen at heaveneverywhere.com> schrieb am Di., 17. Jan.
2023, 22:27:

>
> Hi team,
>
> There seems to be some confusion about what the PackagePaneBrowser is; the
> left-most (top-level) list is supposed to be the class category categories
> (i.e., class category names split after $-, [Kernel, Collections, Graphics,
> ...], analogous to packages).
>
> CT submitted a recent change that broke this, instead delegating to a
> PackageOrganizer; this is different and should be in a separate tool.
>
> Here’s a fix.
>
>
> stp
>
> --------
>
> Stephen Travis Pope    Ojai, California, USA
>
>
>      http://HeavenEverywhere.com
>      http://FASTLabInc.com
>      https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos
>      http://heaveneverywhere.com/Reflections
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20230120/1e264bd0/attachment.html>