[Squeakfoundation]3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)

[Cees de Groot]

On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 08:08, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> I agree with everything you said. About Accufonts, I think it depends on
> what Cees/Andrew can tell us about any discussions with Apple. 
I haven't heard anything back yet. 

Just to make it abundantly clear: Accufonts replacements would be a
token gesture to Apple, it wouldn't do anything to make Squeak more free
because the Accufonts license has exactly the same problem as the Apple
fonts license.

> I would really love to know that Andrew and Cees are talking, and we're
> getting Andrew's best (non-official) advice about how to go about this.
> 
I've given up mailing to Andrew (and Dan) on SqF/Licensing issues last
summer, after never getting responses from either one on repeated
requests. So I'm at the moment 'singlehandedly' tackling discussions
with Apple.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lnx-12.ams-2.theinternetone.net/pipermail/squeakfoundation/attachments/20030308/d6f9ca23/attachment.bin