[Vm-dev] Better type than void* for primitiveFunctionPointer?

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at gmx.de
Tue Apr 15 19:41:05 UTC 2008

I think only Ian knows what "this stupidity" is. Also, I'm not fond of 
profanity in code in general and would consequently just remove the 
comment until an actual criticism / improvement is offered. This kind of 
comment is not helpful and should be expunged whenever one is found.

   - Andreas

tim Rowledge wrote:
> In Interpreter>declareCVarsIn: we currently have:-
>         declareC: 'void *primitiveFunctionPointer'                
> .        "xxxx FIX THIS STUPIDITY xxxx - ikp. What he means is use a 
> better type than void *, apparently - tpr"
> Anyone care to offer the better type than void* ? Speak now or stop 
> whining later.
> tim
> -- 
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Fractured Idiom:- QUE SERA SERF - Life is feudal

More information about the Vm-dev mailing list