[Vm-dev] Linux binaries

laurent laffont laurent.laffont at gmail.com
Sun Apr 11 19:20:00 UTC 2010

Hi Ian,

Please, can you tell me
- which gcc version you use
- which CFLAGS option for configure script

tinyBenchmarks are better with you binaries than mine. I try to learn on


Laurent Laffont

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Ian Piumarta <piumarta at speakeasy.net>wrote:

> Dear Linux hackers,
> Does anyone have experience with making binary releases for 32-bit Linux
> that are compiled on a 64-bit system with -m32?  My Linux development
> machine runs 64-bit Linux and it would be convenient to package 32-bit Linux
> VM binaries on that machine rather than remotely, or worse after rebooting
> into a 32-bit kernel.  Any information or opinions, for or against, would be
> gratefully received!
> If anyone wants to play spot-the-difference:
>  http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-
>  http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-
> One of these was compiled on a 32-bit system, the other on a 64-bit system.
>  (I already know they have slightly different collections of plugins. :)  My
> 32-bit machine happily runs either.
> Cheers,
> Ian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20100411/255963d7/attachment.htm

More information about the Vm-dev mailing list