Hi Levente,
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 00:35, Levente Uzonyi leves@caesar.elte.hu wrote:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Alistair Grant wrote:
Hi All,
If I attempt to execute the following:
| rules |
rules := RBParseTreeRewriter new.
rules replace: 'state at: `@index put: `@expr' with: 'state at: `@index put: `@expr asC_unsigned_int'.
I presume the version you use doesn't support underscores in selectors. Does it work if you use a selector with no underscores in it?
That's it, thanks! (it works without the underscores)
I hate it when I forget to include version information, sorry:
Squeak5.3alpha latest update: #18261 Image format 68021 (64 bit)
AST-Core-eem.97 Refactoring-Changes-eem.22 Refactoring-Core-ul.162 Refactoring-Environment-eem.11 Refactoring-Squeak-Platform-cwp.2 Refactoring-Tests-Changes-lr.16 Refactoring-Tests-Core-lr.56 Refactoring-Tests-Environment-eem.5
How did you load RB? Did you use the Metacello configuration? (it may not be up-to-date)
All the above appear to be the latest versions on http://www.squeaksource.com/rb.
This is a vmmaker image, they were all loaded through:
https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/blob/Cog/image/BuildSqueak...
It sounds like there may be an updated version of RB that already addresses this?
Thanks again, Alistair
Levente
(rules executeTree: (MD5Plugin parseTreeFor: #md5ProcessBuffer:withState:)) ifTrue: [rules tree newSource inspect]. self error: 'parse tree rewrite failed'
I get "Error: End of statement list encountered" (stack trace below). The same works and produces the expected output in Pharo 7.
It looks like the Refactoring Browser has diverged quite a bit between Squeak and Pharo.
Who looks after RB in Squeak, and is there a plan to keep in sync with Pharo, or the other way around, or should this be fixed independently?
Thanks, Alistair