Yes so may be we need real package and mark cs or class definition with them
Stef
On 1 oct. 04, at 08:05, Marcus Denker wrote:
Am 30.09.2004 um 21:20 schrieb Magistrello Alejandro (SFA):
Stef,
the SarBuilder is not part of the image, is an outside package, the fix works, but don't need to be an update
These in-image packages are a real pain: There is no support in the tools to know what part of the system you are not supposed to change, no support to break a change up into pieces. As the system is now, adding more "in image" packages would lead to a real problem soon.
Marcus