On 29 December 2012 22:15, Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 December 2012 21:06, Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 December 2012 18:49, Levente Uzonyi leves@elte.hu wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Frank Shearar wrote:
Other than the fact that the last two builds for SqueakTrunk have hung
- an issue I'm looking into, but wouldn't mind others trying their
luck - are we happy enough with 4.4 that we'd want to ship it?
My gut feel is (and with my Release Manager hat on), judging by the low severity of the few reports we're seeing, that we're there. What do others think?
I think it's time to release it, even though SqueakSSL doesn't like the network changes.
OK. Once I uncover whatever's hanging the SqueakTrunk build I'll yell, and we can give the ReleaseSqueakTrunk artifact one more whirl and declare victory.
It MAY be that there was an intermittent issue with source.squeak.org not accepting connections: I saw a ConnectionRefused while trying to reproduce the hung build locally. That could be because of my flakey home wifi, but then again (a) such an exception would raise a debugger and hang the build and (b) the builds have started not hanging [1]. At any rate, they do log a lot more: the update number, the tests they're running, and so on.
SqueakTrunk looks like it's back in business. ReleaseSqueakTrunk still has issues, because it looks like it's confused (or I've confused it) as to the artifacts it's supposed to use: it's consistently releasing 12324-based images instead of 12326-based ones. I shall hack on...
frank
[1] http://squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/83/console
frank
Levente
One thing we _don't_ have is an "All-in-one" one-click type installer for the various OSes. If someone can show me what to do, I can add a job to spit out such a thing.
frank