I think the Free Software definition requires that the user have the freedom to use the software for any purpose, including commercial. I am not a lawyer, but I have understood this to imply that restricting commercial use would make the license a non-Free one.
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 11:31 PM rabbit rabbit@callistohouse.org wrote:
I am unfamiliar with FOSS licensing. Does anyone know about an open source license that allows free use for free software, but requires payment if its uses are for commercial software?
â˘â˘â˘ đđ đŽđ¤đŞ đđ§đ đđ§đđŤđđŁđ đ đđ¤đ§đ¨đđđ, đŠđđđŁđ đŽđ¤đŞ đđ¤đ§ đ˘đ¤đŤđđŁđ đ¤đŤđđ§, đ¨đ¤ đŠđđđŠ đ đđ¤đŞđĄđ đ¨đđđđĄđŽ đĽđđ¨đ¨! *Arrivederci, rabbit ⢠D*đđŠđ¨đŞđŁ đŽđ°đŹđ ⢠đ°