Am 17.03.2005 um 11:34 schrieb Avi Bryant:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 01:30:50 +0100, Avi Bryant avi.bryant@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:09:38 -0800, Ned Konz ned@squeakland.org wrote:
I think someone ate your code:
It certainly sounds that way. I'm too beat to look into it right now but I'll check it out in the morning.
So, yeah, I had forgotten to recategorize some extension methods and overrides. Oops. That's fixed now; look at PackageInfo 19 and Monticello 228 on SqueakSource.
Note that I don't include the SARBuilding extensions, because they're (maybe) not necessary: Monticello just includes all those scripts as normal code elements within the .mcz.
Please, before it's too late, can we just use Strings in a PackageInfo's preamble/post scripts? Currently they are StringHolders, which is a Bad Idea.
I was bitten by this because I tried out the script button in Monticello, and even though I closed the editor without accepting the postscript was stored, saved with a package, so everyone else got a walkback when trying to load that package in an older MC version. Sure, we could fix this while still retaining the StringHolders in there, but why? I'd prefer a clear separation of data and interface.
- Bert -