30 Nov
2004
30 Nov
'04
8:05 p.m.
stéphane ducasse ducasse@iam.unibe.ch wrote:
So I know that some of you are against having mc in the basic image
I'm not - in fact I was trying to get around to a mail suggesting that MC should be included in Basic. Since Basic is the de facto developer's image (at least until we get to a stage where a real kernel exists that can be built into configurations easily and reliably and by anyone) it seems that it should have the important tools already installed and ready to go.
I claim that MC is important enough that it should be considered a basic tool as much as the file content browser, the protocol browser etc.
tim -- Tim Rowledge, tim@sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim Strange OpCodes: CSD: Charge Surreptitiously to DOE