On Aug 27, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Jason Johnson wrote:
On 8/27/07, Fabio Filasieno fabio.filasieno@gmail.com wrote:
cascade operator. You don't like it, but it still provides something that requires temporary variables to duplicate without it.
ahaaaa ..... I didn't get temp thing right.
There we go. :) I need to work on my communication perhaps. :)
Maybe I'm a bit slow too ;-)
Don't know yet if I like it that way ... But now I see the point; and why somebody might prefer it that way. I wouldn't be so sure now on cutting the ";" cascade out now. I would say - but just now - that there is no pipe vs cascade thing.
Thanks for ringing the bell ....
Thanks for being open to discussing it. :) But I would really suggest finding some project (something with a Seaside web site would be a
I'm writing an interpreter for a scripting language that I have in mind and I can't wait to finish it, and get some critics out of you !
good one) of decent size and implementing it in Smalltalk. There is really nothing quite like this language and many things look a bit different, and if you're open to it, extremely elegant when translated to "the Smalltalk way". I had many concerns about the language myself when I first came here, but now I find I like the Smalltalk way the best.
Anyway thanks a lot for your patience an the "Re: pipe" thread.