OK, so I'll work on the IndexedCollection strictly until the update of the indices are needed. So if I need it, I'll ask you for clues !
Thank you,
Sebastián Sastre
ssastre@seaswork.com.ar Seaswork Special Software Solutions www.seaswork.com.ar
-----Mensaje original----- De: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] En nombre de Avi Bryant Enviado el: Miércoles, 06 de Octubre de 2004 20:52 Para: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Asunto: Re: Relative independence of odbs: IndexedCollection,the update problem
On Oct 6, 2004, at 10:33 PM, Sebastián Sastre wrote:
in one hand, that I don't see a #removeKey: in the TSTree. It
can
have it?
Yup. Just haven't needed it yet, so haven't implemented it.
in the other hand, what about the Btree that can search it's
keys
with wilcards (like #matchesForPrefix: for TSTree)?
Yeah, I haven't gotten around to that either. Though for a BTree I'd expect a range search rather than wildcards...
Either of those things should be reasonably easy for someone else to implement if they wanted them (I don't think my code's *that* illegible). I doubt I'll get to either one any time very soon, since the current functionality seems to be working for what I need - so if you want it, best would be to add it yourself. If the details of the existing code are confusing, give me a shout.
Cheers, Avi
--- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.772 / Virus Database: 519 - Release Date: 01/10/2004
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.772 / Virus Database: 519 - Release Date: 01/10/2004