On Nov 30, 2006, at 12:13 , Andreas Raab wrote:
brad fowlow wrote:
Given that, do the merits benefit allotting a syntax change (a valuable commodity) that could begin to fork the world into ::- dependent and ::-free code? Or would it would be better to acknowledge that letter-prefixing is just about as good, and free, and already there, and hold out for a stronger solution without colonizing the code pool in the meantime?
Bingo. That's precisely the concern I was voicing earlier.
Is there really a scheme of namespaces that would not support fully qualified names? Given that Göran's proposal basically suggests one way of expressing FQNs, shouldn't it be easily supported by any namespace implementation?
- Bert -