On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:53:05 +0100, stéphane ducasse ducasse@iam.unibe.ch wrote:
Hi avi
While I agree on your analysis of our intuition with SCN, I disagree with your conclusion. My impression is that if you consider package as first class category, then package changes should be using SCN and seaside and connector should not. Because soon we will want to have package changes, package list in changesorter.. I think that packages are about code entities and we designed SCN with that vision in mind (package, traits...) should use it else this will be the mess later.
Ok, fair enough. So in answer to Alex's original question, it sounds like probably we do want the first set of events he mentions:
I was wondering what is the impact of adding packages on the system change notification mechanism. I added some events for creating a new package, renaming one, deleting move, moving one method from one packate to another, ...
But not the second set:
What about adding a new repository to a package? What about saving a package?
Right?
Avi