On 29-May-07, at 12:40 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
Yes, that is a very clever solution. You could tidy this up a little by using:
Even better, yield is a very small, fast prim and so using it would have little chance of significantly affecting overall performance of such an algorithm. Much better than the rather longwinded version of yield that used to exist.
tim -- tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful random insult:- A gross ignoramus -- 144 times worse than an ordinary ignoramus.