This is one of the things that made pulling current Polymorph stuff into Squeak painful. If we shared a common ToolBuilder implementation, I would image that other pain points might disappear too.
+1
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:32 AM, stephane ducasse < stephane.ducasse@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes we are. Even if there was some discussions about the usefulness of toolbuilder spec
- I would be in favor.
Stef
On 4/21/2010 4:32 AM, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
A question: Art the ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 and Pharo 1.0 the same? Or if there is a difference what is the impact of it?
Or put the question in another way. If I code an UI using the ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 will it run in Pharo?
They are mostly the same but not identical. If there is interest in the
Pharo community we should merge the versions upstream in http://www.squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder.html (contact me if you're interested).
Cheers,
- Andreas