On 2013-12-02, at 11:22, Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 December 2013 10:16, Bert Freudenberg bert@freudenbergs.de wrote:
Converting between setters and getters seems generally useful to me, so even if at the moment it may be only used in Etoys, I'd not make it an Etoys-specific extension.
Since we ship Etoys in a standard Squeak image, how about we keep these methods in Etoys until we do start mangling selectors elsewhere? In other words, pull the methods out on demand? (I have no objections to them moving out of Etoys if they do prove to be generally useful.)
frank
I'm fine either way. However, it seems to me a third-party package would rather roll their own than depending on Etoys-stuff, no? Depending on System is fine, as is (even more so) on Collections, but depending on Etoys, not so much.
- Bert -