Fast or not is not a problem. This could be for run once.
Otherwise, if 3.10 will work all with modules, this is not needed.
En Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:05:20 +0100, Pavel Krivanek squeak1@continentalbrno.cz escribió:
Hi,
I played with this idea of automatical image segmentation but the fastest, safest and maybe the only possible way now is to do that all by hand. The better way to create specialized images is IMHO from bottom. So we should simply continue in started modularization and packaging effort.
Cheers, -- Pavel
On 2/22/07, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi glpunzi@zyoconsulting.com wrote:
I don't know if others thinks like me, but I think something like this could be intereseting for prepare a ready for end-users image (without 70MB of size)
Something like this could have "don't delete develop tools" for example, but all the packages don't used, disappear from this image.
En Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:47:12 +0100, Göran Krampe goran@krampe.se escribió:
Hi!
Imagine this.
You select one or various categories and "Intelligent Shrink" browse
all
the image searching all the objects thath the selected categories
uses.
If a categorie is not use or not will use it for our selected categories then erase it.
Example: I create a "set" of objects, and use objects from Kernel, Morphic etc.. But no object uses Monticello. Then, "Intelligent Shrink" may delete
all
Monticello's class not used.
Is this possible on Squeak?
I guess there are a whole bunch of ways to do such an analysis (that
is
more or less probably to be correct), MudPie springs to mind of
course.
Can't give you an SM-link right now because the nameservers for squeak.org seems to be unreachable right now - have no idea. I can't verify if
SM is
up or down because I don't have the IP of squeak.org in my head.
regards, Göran
-- Giuseppe Luigi Punzi - Consultor
:: ZYO Consulting ::
email: glpunzi@zyoconsulting.com tlfno: +34 675 145 912 web: http://www.zyoconsulting.co