Again Magma and 3.9

[Chris Muller]

Hi Martin, thank you for at least trying to run the benchmarker so we
could have a common understanding of "slow".  For the error you got,
"cannot connect to 127.0.0.1 5109", is it possible that loopback
address is wrong or maybe the computer was not allowed to open a port
and therefore Squeak's  Socket class was unable to establish a
connection?  I did try 

Depending on several factors, you may expect adding 15000 objects to an
unindexed MagmaCollection to take about two minutes on a medium-speed
computer.

Bulk loads aren't fast, but there are a few settings that can ensure
they maintain optimum speed, otherwise it can degenerate badly.

Would you share your load script and MessageTally that I might see
something obvious?

"Magma tester" off of *SqueakMap* is a stable version you may wish to
start with.

Let me know how I may help,
  Chris


--- Martin Beck <martin.beck at hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:

> Hi there, I've looked through the mailing list but didn't find
> help... :(
> 
> We've been trying to get magma to work in a useful state the whole
> day
> now. ;) We have a clean 3.9 image, got a server and a connection to
> it.
> however batch inserting 15000 entries into a magmacollection seems to
> be
> very slow. We couldn't get the MagmaBenchmark MagmaBenchmarker
> runRemoteBaseline: false to work. It displays a "cannot connect to
> 127.0.0.1 5109" error message.
> 
> We tried to load www.squeaksource.com/MagmaTester, but this gaves an
> "Outage" error as reported earlier on this list...
> 
> Help is appreciated,
> regards,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Magma mailing list
> Magma at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
>