[Seaside] Pharo 1.1.1 and Cog?
Sven Van Caekenberghe
sven at beta9.be
Tue Oct 12 07:43:02 UTC 2010
End of august I wrote:
I did a quick benchmark on that last image: where I used to get 70 requests/second I now get 230 requests/second.
Nothing scientific, but Komanche+Seaside3 on Cog was almost 3 times faster...
On 12 Oct 2010, at 09:38, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> Komanche is kind of slow as a web server on Cog (slower than on a
> normal VM). I suspect that this is because of DynamicBindings that do
> a lot of ugly stack trickery. We need to replace or fix Komanche in
> that regard. I don't know the state of the Zn-Server? Philippe?
> Seaside itself is fast, noticeably faster.
> On 12 October 2010 09:32, Davorin Rusevljan <davorin.rusevljan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sure, the one-click images run on Cog.
>> whoha, that is great! How does it stack up regarding seaside performance
>> when compared to classic VM? Any stability issues?
>> seaside mailing list
>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Lukas Renggli
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the seaside