[Seaside] Live Ruby on rails tutorial sites

[Sebastian Sastre]

makes sense.

Question Goran:  
what would be the preferred persistent method in such apps?

sebastian

o/

On Jan 24, 2012, at 6:38 AM, Göran Krampe wrote:

> Hi all!
> 
> On 01/23/2012 09:05 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>> 2012/1/23 Robert Sirois<watchlala at hotmail.com>:
>>> What about Amber?
>> 
>> Amber doesn't run Seaside.
> 
> True, but Amber does have a similar Canvas API and Widget is similar to WAComponent in its role etc. So yes, definitely *not* the same thing - but if the goal is to attract people to the "Smalltalk arena" of web apps it is still a good thing to have.
> 
> And with Amber there is no problem letting the users go berzerk - it's all on the client side anyway, and one can use local storage etc to make sure stuff is not "lost".
> 
> But again - not Seaside. But similar. ;)
> 
> regards, Göran
> 
> PS. I love Seaside and Iliad etc, but for me personally it's all about client side now. We are using javascript with the help from Nicolas to build a full "fat" HTML5 client for a customer. And for a personal project I am going "all Amber" for the client. The server then gets transformed into a "RPC backend". And for that, one can use a multitude of technology, with Socket.io being the "sexiest".
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20120124/e189161a/attachment.htm