[squeak-dev] Re: Swazoo - LGPL or MIT?

Sebastian Sastre ssastre at seaswork.com
Wed Mar 26 21:36:28 UTC 2008

> Bruce Badger wrote:
> > This only leaves one thing:
> > 
> > Janko, could you please confirm that you now accept that Swazoo is
> > under the LGPL and has been since the inception of the project?
> Let it go. You got what you wanted (the license changed in all the 
> places you desired). Let this be enough. There is no need for 
> a public 
> humiliation here.
> Cheers,
>    - Andreas

Why initialize deprecated "inquisition software" in an open spirit community? Which reasons or real intentions could possibly motivate that? Why raise the voice to defend an hypotetical claim nobody is making?

Please lets discus things which allow us to have a better future for us and Squeak and let useless objects and messages to go away with the wind (hopefully GC'd).

Give more time to license understanding maintaining a willing of a good end for this so something more mature can emerge in a near future.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list