[squeak-dev] TextLineInterval>>#justifiedPadFor: and spurious dirty packages

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Tue Dec 3 08:23:05 UTC 2013


On 02 Dec 2013, at 22:42, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com> wrote:

> It appears it was due to a corrupt ancestry in 45Deprecated.  45Deprecated-fbs.3 was the version included in Squeak4.5-13352 at the FTP site, but since no future package had that version as an ancestor, everything was merged during the update, resulting in spurious dirties.
> 
> I reposted Squeak4.5-13352 with 45Deprecated-fbs.5 loaded and that seems to fix it. 

Thanks for taking the time to find & fix the problem (especially since it's my fault). However, we should never replace/alter versioned artifacts. I would rather you had deleted the file and put a new file with a different name on the site. Even calling it 4.4-rc0 would work for me, but definitely not 4.5-13352.

frank

> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 December 2013 20:18, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> > This method keeps appearing in my image, causing a dirty ST80 package.
> >  Is anyone else seeing this?  No senders, but I keep needing to revert
> > the package to know what I've got dirty in the image.
> 
> I can't say I've seen this.
> 
> > Also seeing some spurious class-category "changes" causing dirty
> > packages, even though I'm not doing any recategorizing..
> 
> I make sure nowadays that I don't issue commits with shuffled class
> categories, but I certainly have done so in the past. Monticello
> considers an order change in the categories to be significant, but I
> vaguely remember Bert committing something to mitigate the issue.
> 
> frank
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20131203/cceef096/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list