Hi Tobias,

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

>
> On 28.10.2014, at 22:31, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 28.10.2014, at 20:28, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Tobias Pape wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> On 28.10.2014, at 17:23, commits at source.squeak.org wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Item was changed:
> > >>> ==== ERROR ===
> > >>>
> > >>> Error: Unrecognized class type
> > >>
> > >> Well, this is gonna be interesting in the future.
> > >> Are SPUR MCZs now completely incompatible to non-spur MCZs?
> > >>
> > >> This would be terrible…
> > >>
> > >
> > > No, but Spur has new class formats which are not recognized by
> SqueakSource. I shouldn't be hard to fix it for someone who knows how
> SqueakSource works, and what the new formats are.
> >
> > SqueakSource uses the available Monticello.
> > This obviously means that the “old” monticello is incompatible to
> > the Class formats of SPUR, right?
> >
> > Arguably.  But simply update Monticello to Monticello-eem.592 or later
> and there's no problem.  Can we not do that for the SqueakSource image?
>
>
> Should be possible. But I have no access to it.
>
> While we are at it; can we make provisions for
> GemStone class formats? They differ ever so slightly
> and it is really hard to keep all in sync.
>

I wouldn't know, but perhaps you could take a look?  I had to do very
little to support a new format.  The one method I needed to modify was
MCClassDefinition>>#kindOfSubclass

We now have:
>         Squeak/Pharo Class formats (ca Squeak 3.8 - Squeak 4.6/Pharo3.0)
>         Squeak/Pharo SPUR Class Formats (current and possibly onward)

        GemStone class formats (somewhat mapped from the squeak ones)
>
> I did a bit of coding for the gemstone monticello version about one or
> two years back and the mapping between the known monticello class formats
> and gemstone class formats is a little fragile, I think.
>
> Best
>         -Tobias
>
>
>


-- 
best,
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20141028/0528af12/attachment.htm